geekradar
Int
Explore GeekRadar

More to explore

Good gear All topics About us Say hello
GeekRadar / The comparison desk
COMPARE.
AI models
meta

Muse Wonder

AI model Released

Context window
1,048,576 tokens
Maximum output
131,072 tokens
Open weights
No

Capability & preference

General capability · ECI

A cross-benchmark capability estimate. Index points, not a percentage; intervals show uncertainty.

Muse Wonder 161.7* Muse Wonder · 95% interval 159.2–164.6

Model performance

Radar task score: four tests, equal weight. An experimental summary of these tasks, not a universal intelligence rating.

Muse Wonder

Radar task score

Unrated

2/4 core tests · not enough evidence

5 benchmark results for this configuration

Scientific reasoning

GPQA Diamond · 25%

Expert-written science questions; strict multiple-choice scoring. Chance accuracy is 25%.

Muse Wonder Not available

Novel problem solving

Mystery Game Puzzles · 25%

Best-next-move puzzles in an undisclosed game variant. A narrow reasoning test, not general intelligence.

Muse Wonder 51.0*% Approx. 95% interval: 41.2–60.8%

Advanced mathematics

FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 · 25%

Private v2 mathematics problems with Python tools. Earlier versions and Tier 4 are excluded.

Muse Wonder 82.1*% Approx. 95% interval: 77.6–86.6%

Factual answers

SimpleQA Verified · 25%

Correct factual answers under a guessing prompt, graded by a model. Not a hallucination or abstention score.

Muse Wonder Not available

Competition mathematics

OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · Separate result

Competition problems with model-extracted answers checked against an exact key. Earlier grading procedures are excluded.

Muse Wonder 99.4*% Approx. 95% interval: 98.7–100.0%

Research mathematics

FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 · Separate result

The hardest private FrontierMath problems, corrected v2 set, with Python tools. Separate from Tiers 1-3 in the core score.

Muse Wonder 70.7*% Approx. 95% interval: 56.6–84.8%

Visual spatial reasoning

Furniture Assembly · Separate result

Assembly-error detection from photos and manuals, with zoom and Python tools. Uses model-assisted grading; not a general vision score.

Muse Wonder 54.2*% Approx. 95% interval: 41.6–66.8%

Bars show reported task scores. Whiskers are approximate 95% intervals where standard errors are available. Different reasoning budgets are not equal-cost tests. Missing results are never zero.

Run it locally

Inference · memory estimate

Muse Wonder

Closed weights. No supported local deployment or GPU requirement is published.

API cost

USD / month

Standard text-token estimate. Excludes taxes, caching, batch discounts, reasoning and multimodal surcharges. Provider limits and regional availability may differ.

Muse Wonder

Capabilities

Context window
1,048,576 tokens
Maximum output
131,072 tokens
Reasoning
Yes
Tool calling
Yes
Open weights
No

Input modalities

  • text
  • image
  • video
  • pdf
  • audio

Output modalities

  • text

* Provisional data