Ideas deserve a closer look.
Clarity, evidence and context. The standards we aim to meet in every story.
Substance before spectacle
GeekRadar aims to publish technology coverage that adds understanding, not just another headline. A useful story explains the development, its practical implications and its limits. We value specific detail over inflated claims and clear language over jargon.
Evidence and context
Material claims should be supported by identifiable evidence. Announcements, vendor claims, independent findings and our interpretation should be distinguishable. Dates, regional availability and important qualifications belong alongside the claims they affect. Uncertainty should be stated, not hidden.
Useful product coverage
Specifications are a starting point. Good product coverage explains what a feature changes in everyday use, where its limits lie and which details depend on your market. Comparisons should help readers understand meaningful differences.
Corrections and feedback
Accuracy takes continuing attention. If something looks wrong or needs more context, send a correction with the article link, the detail in question and any supporting evidence. Substantive corrections should be made clear to readers.
A publication worth returning to
Our ambition is a thoughtful, accessible technology publication that earns attention through useful content. These standards guide that work; they are a commitment to keep improving, not a claim that every story is beyond question.