GeekRadar / The comparison desk
COMPARE.
AI models
ant-group

ling-flash-2.0

Model evaluation

Capability & preference

Human preference · Arena

Overall text preferences from head-to-head votes. Not factual accuracy or a task-success rate.

ling-flash-2.0 1361.2 ling-flash-2.0 · 95% interval 1354.0–1368.4 · 6,947 votes · 2026-10-15

Recorded results

Only the same benchmark, version, workload, scenario and unit share a row. Missing results are not zero. System results include the full submitted hardware and software configuration.

Arena text preference / chinesehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,417.75 rating

Confidence interval: 1,390.58 – 1,444.92

454 votes

Category
chinese
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / codinghuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,388.93 rating

Confidence interval: 1,374.42 – 1,403.45

1542 votes

Category
coding
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / creative_writinghuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,287.14 rating

Confidence interval: 1,267.08 – 1,307.20

852 votes

Category
creative_writing
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / englishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,385.91 rating

Confidence interval: 1,375.52 – 1,396.30

3041 votes

Category
english
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / exclude_tieshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,323.53 rating

Confidence interval: 1,313.37 – 1,333.69

4888 votes

Category
exclude_ties
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / experthuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,354.70 rating

Confidence interval: 1,325.01 – 1,384.39

354 votes

Category
expert
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_promptshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,362.82 rating

Confidence interval: 1,352.99 – 1,372.66

3459 votes

Category
hard_prompts
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_prompts_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,387.39 rating

Confidence interval: 1,373.12 – 1,401.66

1605 votes

Category
hard_prompts_english
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,357.51 rating

Confidence interval: 1,341.39 – 1,373.64

1318 votes

Category
industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operations
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_mediahuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,294.63 rating

Confidence interval: 1,277.97 – 1,311.28

1201 votes

Category
industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_media
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_legal_and_governmenthuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,363.17 rating

Confidence interval: 1,335.50 – 1,390.85

417 votes

Category
industry_legal_and_government
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_life_and_physical_and_social_sciencehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,381.58 rating

Confidence interval: 1,363.49 – 1,399.68

1010 votes

Category
industry_life_and_physical_and_social_science
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_mathematicalhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,368.20 rating

Confidence interval: 1,339.97 – 1,396.42

380 votes

Category
industry_mathematical
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_medicine_and_healthcarehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,358.20 rating

Confidence interval: 1,328.12 – 1,388.27

356 votes

Category
industry_medicine_and_healthcare
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_software_and_it_serviceshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,400.29 rating

Confidence interval: 1,388.77 – 1,411.81

2514 votes

Category
industry_software_and_it_services
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_writing_and_literature_and_languagehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,295.39 rating

Confidence interval: 1,280.17 – 1,310.61

1475 votes

Category
industry_writing_and_literature_and_language
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / instruction_followinghuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,318.69 rating

Confidence interval: 1,305.30 – 1,332.07

1839 votes

Category
instruction_following
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / koreanhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,333.16 rating

Confidence interval: 1,295.49 – 1,370.84

239 votes

Category
korean
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / longer_queryhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,324.63 rating

Confidence interval: 1,308.74 – 1,340.52

1287 votes

Category
longer_query
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / mathhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,363.96 rating

Confidence interval: 1,337.43 – 1,390.50

452 votes

Category
math
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / multi_turnhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,322.62 rating

Confidence interval: 1,305.13 – 1,340.12

1117 votes

Category
multi_turn
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / non_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,334.88 rating

Confidence interval: 1,325.53 – 1,344.23

3906 votes

Category
non_english
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / overallhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,361.17 rating

Confidence interval: 1,353.96 – 1,368.37

6947 votes

Category
overall
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / polishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,311.50 rating

Confidence interval: 1,278.37 – 1,344.64

326 votes

Category
polish
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / russianhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,306.95 rating

Confidence interval: 1,280.96 – 1,332.94

477 votes

Category
russian
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / spanishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

ling-flash-2.0

1,404.87 rating

Confidence interval: 1,368.90 – 1,440.84

277 votes

Category
spanish
Evaluated configuration
ling-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference

Run it locally

Inference · memory estimate

ling-flash-2.0

Not enough verified architecture information for a reliable VRAM estimate.

Capabilities

Model license
MIT