GeekRadar / The comparison desk
COMPARE.
AI models
ant-group

Ring-flash-2.0

Model evaluation

Capability & preference

Human preference · Arena

Overall text preferences from head-to-head votes. Not factual accuracy or a task-success rate.

Ring-flash-2.0 1333.7 Ring-flash-2.0 · 95% interval 1326.5–1340.9 · 6,987 votes · 2026-10-28

Recorded results

Only the same benchmark, version, workload, scenario and unit share a row. Missing results are not zero. System results include the full submitted hardware and software configuration.

Arena text preference / chinesehuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,398.48 rating

Confidence interval: 1,371.90 – 1,425.07

442 votes

Category
chinese
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / codinghuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,366.12 rating

Confidence interval: 1,351.26 – 1,380.98

1506 votes

Category
coding
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / creative_writinghuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,269.86 rating

Confidence interval: 1,250.21 – 1,289.51

888 votes

Category
creative_writing
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / englishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,367.00 rating

Confidence interval: 1,356.54 – 1,377.46

3058 votes

Category
english
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / exclude_tieshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,285.29 rating

Confidence interval: 1,275.09 – 1,295.49

4961 votes

Category
exclude_ties
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / experthuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,342.94 rating

Confidence interval: 1,312.24 – 1,373.64

359 votes

Category
expert
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_promptshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,344.28 rating

Confidence interval: 1,334.46 – 1,354.11

3542 votes

Category
hard_prompts
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_prompts_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,377.60 rating

Confidence interval: 1,363.09 – 1,392.11

1593 votes

Category
hard_prompts_english
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,329.04 rating

Confidence interval: 1,312.94 – 1,345.14

1320 votes

Category
industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operations
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_mediahuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,285.99 rating

Confidence interval: 1,269.78 – 1,302.21

1257 votes

Category
industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_media
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_legal_and_governmenthuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,307.80 rating

Confidence interval: 1,279.01 – 1,336.59

429 votes

Category
industry_legal_and_government
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_life_and_physical_and_social_sciencehuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,342.99 rating

Confidence interval: 1,324.90 – 1,361.08

1081 votes

Category
industry_life_and_physical_and_social_science
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_mathematicalhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,365.17 rating

Confidence interval: 1,335.10 – 1,395.24

364 votes

Category
industry_mathematical
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_medicine_and_healthcarehuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,334.92 rating

Confidence interval: 1,304.44 – 1,365.40

380 votes

Category
industry_medicine_and_healthcare
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_software_and_it_serviceshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,365.62 rating

Confidence interval: 1,354.02 – 1,377.21

2497 votes

Category
industry_software_and_it_services
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_writing_and_literature_and_languagehuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,296.67 rating

Confidence interval: 1,281.51 – 1,311.84

1495 votes

Category
industry_writing_and_literature_and_language
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / instruction_followinghuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,313.65 rating

Confidence interval: 1,300.22 – 1,327.07

1872 votes

Category
instruction_following
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / koreanhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,265.17 rating

Confidence interval: 1,224.94 – 1,305.40

232 votes

Category
korean
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / longer_queryhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,320.61 rating

Confidence interval: 1,304.74 – 1,336.48

1364 votes

Category
longer_query
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / mathhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,349.28 rating

Confidence interval: 1,322.32 – 1,376.24

447 votes

Category
math
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / multi_turnhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,287.91 rating

Confidence interval: 1,270.18 – 1,305.64

1150 votes

Category
multi_turn
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / non_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,299.36 rating

Confidence interval: 1,289.97 – 1,308.75

3929 votes

Category
non_english
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / overallhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,333.68 rating

Confidence interval: 1,326.47 – 1,340.89

6987 votes

Category
overall
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / polishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,273.96 rating

Confidence interval: 1,243.39 – 1,304.53

367 votes

Category
polish
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / russianhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,244.23 rating

Confidence interval: 1,218.11 – 1,270.36

493 votes

Category
russian
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / spanishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Ring-flash-2.0

1,384.81 rating

Confidence interval: 1,350.54 – 1,419.08

307 votes

Category
spanish
Evaluated configuration
Ring-flash-2.0
Evaluation type
human preference

Run it locally

Inference · memory estimate

Ring-flash-2.0

Not enough verified architecture information for a reliable VRAM estimate.

Capabilities

Model license
MIT