GeekRadar / The comparison desk
COMPARE.
AI models
Not reported

MPT 30B Chat

Model evaluation

Capability & preference

Human preference · Arena

Overall text preferences from head-to-head votes. Not factual accuracy or a task-success rate.

MPT 30B Chat 1068.6 MPT 30B Chat · 95% interval 1056.5–1080.7 · 2,572 votes · 2026-10-28

Recorded results

Only the same benchmark, version, workload, scenario and unit share a row. Missing results are not zero. System results include the full submitted hardware and software configuration.

Arena text preference / codinghuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

1,039.01 rating

Confidence interval: 1,004.51 – 1,073.51

258 votes

Category
coding
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / creative_writinghuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

1,073.75 rating

Confidence interval: 1,045.16 – 1,102.33

452 votes

Category
creative_writing
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / englishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

1,102.20 rating

Confidence interval: 1,088.54 – 1,115.86

2056 votes

Category
english
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / exclude_tieshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

895.09 rating

Confidence interval: 877.43 – 912.75

1777 votes

Category
exclude_ties
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_promptshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

1,051.43 rating

Confidence interval: 1,024.90 – 1,077.97

434 votes

Category
hard_prompts
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_prompts_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

1,082.38 rating

Confidence interval: 1,052.78 – 1,111.98

359 votes

Category
hard_prompts_english
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

1,008.35 rating

Confidence interval: 970.57 – 1,046.14

207 votes

Category
industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operations
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_mediahuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

1,055.11 rating

Confidence interval: 1,026.44 – 1,083.78

435 votes

Category
industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_media
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_life_and_physical_and_social_sciencehuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

1,038.20 rating

Confidence interval: 1,011.94 – 1,064.47

509 votes

Category
industry_life_and_physical_and_social_science
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_mathematicalhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

1,053.17 rating

Confidence interval: 1,016.47 – 1,089.86

218 votes

Category
industry_mathematical
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_software_and_it_serviceshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

1,057.51 rating

Confidence interval: 1,033.12 – 1,081.90

575 votes

Category
industry_software_and_it_services
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_writing_and_literature_and_languagehuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

1,079.24 rating

Confidence interval: 1,056.71 – 1,101.77

647 votes

Category
industry_writing_and_literature_and_language
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / instruction_followinghuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

1,053.79 rating

Confidence interval: 1,032.52 – 1,075.06

718 votes

Category
instruction_following
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / mathhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

1,046.59 rating

Confidence interval: 1,012.74 – 1,080.44

242 votes

Category
math
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / multi_turnhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

1,054.52 rating

Confidence interval: 1,022.57 – 1,086.47

341 votes

Category
multi_turn
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / non_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

990.44 rating

Confidence interval: 966.83 – 1,014.05

516 votes

Category
non_english
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / overallhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

MPT 30B Chat

1,068.58 rating

Confidence interval: 1,056.49 – 1,080.68

2572 votes

Category
overall
Evaluated configuration
MPT 30B Chat
Evaluation type
human preference

Run it locally

Inference · memory estimate

MPT 30B Chat

Not enough verified architecture information for a reliable VRAM estimate.

Capabilities

Model license
CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0