GeekRadar / The comparison desk
COMPARE.
AI models
openai

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

Model evaluation

Capability & preference

Human preference · Arena

Overall text preferences from head-to-head votes. Not factual accuracy or a task-success rate.

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14) 1284.8 GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14) · 95% interval 1277.2–1292.4 · 6,103 votes · 2026-11-08

Recorded results

Only the same benchmark, version, workload, scenario and unit share a row. Missing results are not zero. System results include the full submitted hardware and software configuration.

Arena text preference / chinesehuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,270.11 rating

Confidence interval: 1,234.36 – 1,305.86

246 votes

Category
chinese
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / codinghuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,305.49 rating

Confidence interval: 1,286.24 – 1,324.74

807 votes

Category
coding
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / creative_writinghuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,259.96 rating

Confidence interval: 1,241.75 – 1,278.16

1005 votes

Category
creative_writing
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / englishhuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,303.20 rating

Confidence interval: 1,293.41 – 1,313.00

3528 votes

Category
english
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / exclude_tieshuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,210.27 rating

Confidence interval: 1,198.24 – 1,222.30

3981 votes

Category
exclude_ties
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / experthuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,271.10 rating

Confidence interval: 1,240.98 – 1,301.23

328 votes

Category
expert
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / germanhuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,287.84 rating

Confidence interval: 1,251.12 – 1,324.55

222 votes

Category
german
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_promptshuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,285.56 rating

Confidence interval: 1,272.07 – 1,299.05

1669 votes

Category
hard_prompts
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_prompts_englishhuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,292.44 rating

Confidence interval: 1,275.45 – 1,309.42

1062 votes

Category
hard_prompts_english
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationshuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,266.44 rating

Confidence interval: 1,244.50 – 1,288.37

651 votes

Category
industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operations
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_mediahuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,242.64 rating

Confidence interval: 1,225.47 – 1,259.80

1061 votes

Category
industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_media
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_legal_and_governmenthuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,300.10 rating

Confidence interval: 1,271.95 – 1,328.25

382 votes

Category
industry_legal_and_government
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_life_and_physical_and_social_sciencehuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,297.34 rating

Confidence interval: 1,281.01 – 1,313.67

1162 votes

Category
industry_life_and_physical_and_social_science
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_mathematicalhuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,274.59 rating

Confidence interval: 1,250.64 – 1,298.54

534 votes

Category
industry_mathematical
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_medicine_and_healthcarehuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,276.29 rating

Confidence interval: 1,244.11 – 1,308.46

302 votes

Category
industry_medicine_and_healthcare
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_software_and_it_serviceshuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,304.77 rating

Confidence interval: 1,290.10 – 1,319.45

1454 votes

Category
industry_software_and_it_services
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_writing_and_literature_and_languagehuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,260.79 rating

Confidence interval: 1,246.62 – 1,274.96

1583 votes

Category
industry_writing_and_literature_and_language
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / instruction_followinghuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,266.32 rating

Confidence interval: 1,253.94 – 1,278.70

2015 votes

Category
instruction_following
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / japanesehuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,198.60 rating

Confidence interval: 1,153.52 – 1,243.68

160 votes

Category
japanese
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / longer_queryhuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,282.42 rating

Confidence interval: 1,262.52 – 1,302.32

730 votes

Category
longer_query
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / mathhuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,274.30 rating

Confidence interval: 1,251.32 – 1,297.28

582 votes

Category
math
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / multi_turnhuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,276.59 rating

Confidence interval: 1,258.57 – 1,294.61

1000 votes

Category
multi_turn
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / non_englishhuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,259.96 rating

Confidence interval: 1,248.87 – 1,271.04

2575 votes

Category
non_english
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / overallhuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,284.80 rating

Confidence interval: 1,277.15 – 1,292.44

6103 votes

Category
overall
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / russianhuman preference · 2026-11-08 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,260.99 rating

Confidence interval: 1,240.30 – 1,281.67

702 votes

Category
russian
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference

Run it locally

Inference · memory estimate

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

Not enough verified architecture information for a reliable VRAM estimate.

Capabilities

Model license
Proprietary