GeekRadar / The comparison desk
COMPARE.
AI models
openai

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

Model evaluation

Capability & preference

Human preference · Arena

Overall text preferences from head-to-head votes. Not factual accuracy or a task-success rate.

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14) 1284.8 GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14) · 95% interval 1277.1–1292.4 · 6,103 votes · 2026-11-09

Recorded results

Only the same benchmark, version, workload, scenario and unit share a row. Missing results are not zero. System results include the full submitted hardware and software configuration.

Arena text preference / chinesehuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,270.15 rating

Confidence interval: 1,234.41 – 1,305.90

246 votes

Category
chinese
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / codinghuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,305.52 rating

Confidence interval: 1,286.27 – 1,324.77

807 votes

Category
coding
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / creative_writinghuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,260.05 rating

Confidence interval: 1,241.84 – 1,278.26

1005 votes

Category
creative_writing
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / englishhuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,303.22 rating

Confidence interval: 1,293.42 – 1,313.01

3528 votes

Category
english
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / exclude_tieshuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,210.25 rating

Confidence interval: 1,198.22 – 1,222.29

3981 votes

Category
exclude_ties
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / experthuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,271.04 rating

Confidence interval: 1,240.92 – 1,301.16

328 votes

Category
expert
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / germanhuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,287.78 rating

Confidence interval: 1,251.06 – 1,324.49

222 votes

Category
german
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_promptshuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,285.52 rating

Confidence interval: 1,272.04 – 1,299.01

1669 votes

Category
hard_prompts
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_prompts_englishhuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,292.44 rating

Confidence interval: 1,275.46 – 1,309.43

1062 votes

Category
hard_prompts_english
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationshuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,266.42 rating

Confidence interval: 1,244.49 – 1,288.36

651 votes

Category
industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operations
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_mediahuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,242.70 rating

Confidence interval: 1,225.53 – 1,259.87

1061 votes

Category
industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_media
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_legal_and_governmenthuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,300.09 rating

Confidence interval: 1,271.94 – 1,328.24

382 votes

Category
industry_legal_and_government
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_life_and_physical_and_social_sciencehuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,297.34 rating

Confidence interval: 1,281.01 – 1,313.67

1162 votes

Category
industry_life_and_physical_and_social_science
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_mathematicalhuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,274.63 rating

Confidence interval: 1,250.68 – 1,298.58

534 votes

Category
industry_mathematical
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_medicine_and_healthcarehuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,276.26 rating

Confidence interval: 1,244.08 – 1,308.43

302 votes

Category
industry_medicine_and_healthcare
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_software_and_it_serviceshuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,304.77 rating

Confidence interval: 1,290.10 – 1,319.44

1454 votes

Category
industry_software_and_it_services
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_writing_and_literature_and_languagehuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,260.85 rating

Confidence interval: 1,246.69 – 1,275.02

1583 votes

Category
industry_writing_and_literature_and_language
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / instruction_followinghuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,266.36 rating

Confidence interval: 1,253.98 – 1,278.74

2015 votes

Category
instruction_following
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / japanesehuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,198.65 rating

Confidence interval: 1,153.57 – 1,243.74

160 votes

Category
japanese
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / longer_queryhuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,282.52 rating

Confidence interval: 1,262.62 – 1,302.42

730 votes

Category
longer_query
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / mathhuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,274.31 rating

Confidence interval: 1,251.33 – 1,297.29

582 votes

Category
math
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / multi_turnhuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,276.53 rating

Confidence interval: 1,258.51 – 1,294.55

1000 votes

Category
multi_turn
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / non_englishhuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,259.94 rating

Confidence interval: 1,248.86 – 1,271.03

2575 votes

Category
non_english
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / overallhuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,284.79 rating

Confidence interval: 1,277.15 – 1,292.43

6103 votes

Category
overall
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / russianhuman preference · 2026-11-09 · rating

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

1,261.00 rating

Confidence interval: 1,240.31 – 1,281.68

702 votes

Category
russian
Evaluated configuration
GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)
Evaluation type
human preference

Run it locally

Inference · memory estimate

GPT-4.1 nano (2025-04-14)

Not enough verified architecture information for a reliable VRAM estimate.

Capabilities

Model license
Proprietary