GeekRadar / The comparison desk
COMPARE.
AI models
openai

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

Model evaluation

Capability & preference

Human preference · Arena

Overall text preferences from head-to-head votes. Not factual accuracy or a task-success rate.

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14 1284.8 gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14 · 95% interval 1277.1–1292.4 · 6,103 votes · 2026-10-15

Recorded results

Only the same benchmark, version, workload, scenario and unit share a row. Missing results are not zero. System results include the full submitted hardware and software configuration.

Arena text preference / chinesehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,270.06 rating

Confidence interval: 1,234.30 – 1,305.83

246 votes

Category
chinese
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / codinghuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,305.48 rating

Confidence interval: 1,286.22 – 1,324.73

807 votes

Category
coding
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / creative_writinghuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,259.96 rating

Confidence interval: 1,241.76 – 1,278.17

1005 votes

Category
creative_writing
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / englishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,303.18 rating

Confidence interval: 1,293.38 – 1,312.97

3528 votes

Category
english
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / exclude_tieshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,210.28 rating

Confidence interval: 1,198.25 – 1,222.31

3981 votes

Category
exclude_ties
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / experthuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,271.32 rating

Confidence interval: 1,241.19 – 1,301.45

328 votes

Category
expert
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / germanhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,287.84 rating

Confidence interval: 1,251.15 – 1,324.54

222 votes

Category
german
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_promptshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,285.56 rating

Confidence interval: 1,272.07 – 1,299.05

1669 votes

Category
hard_prompts
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_prompts_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,292.45 rating

Confidence interval: 1,275.46 – 1,309.44

1062 votes

Category
hard_prompts_english
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,266.58 rating

Confidence interval: 1,244.64 – 1,288.52

651 votes

Category
industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operations
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_mediahuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,242.68 rating

Confidence interval: 1,225.51 – 1,259.85

1061 votes

Category
industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_media
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_legal_and_governmenthuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,299.82 rating

Confidence interval: 1,271.66 – 1,327.97

382 votes

Category
industry_legal_and_government
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_life_and_physical_and_social_sciencehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,297.31 rating

Confidence interval: 1,280.98 – 1,313.64

1162 votes

Category
industry_life_and_physical_and_social_science
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_mathematicalhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,274.44 rating

Confidence interval: 1,250.48 – 1,298.39

534 votes

Category
industry_mathematical
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_medicine_and_healthcarehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,276.16 rating

Confidence interval: 1,243.98 – 1,308.34

302 votes

Category
industry_medicine_and_healthcare
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_software_and_it_serviceshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,304.78 rating

Confidence interval: 1,290.11 – 1,319.46

1454 votes

Category
industry_software_and_it_services
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_writing_and_literature_and_languagehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,260.89 rating

Confidence interval: 1,246.72 – 1,275.06

1583 votes

Category
industry_writing_and_literature_and_language
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / instruction_followinghuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,266.36 rating

Confidence interval: 1,253.99 – 1,278.74

2015 votes

Category
instruction_following
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / japanesehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,198.33 rating

Confidence interval: 1,153.27 – 1,243.40

160 votes

Category
japanese
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / longer_queryhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,282.50 rating

Confidence interval: 1,262.60 – 1,302.41

730 votes

Category
longer_query
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / mathhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,274.33 rating

Confidence interval: 1,251.35 – 1,297.31

582 votes

Category
math
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / multi_turnhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,276.67 rating

Confidence interval: 1,258.65 – 1,294.69

1000 votes

Category
multi_turn
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / non_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,259.99 rating

Confidence interval: 1,248.90 – 1,271.07

2575 votes

Category
non_english
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / overallhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,284.78 rating

Confidence interval: 1,277.14 – 1,292.42

6103 votes

Category
overall
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / russianhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

1,261.09 rating

Confidence interval: 1,240.40 – 1,281.78

702 votes

Category
russian
Evaluated configuration
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14
Evaluation type
human preference

Run it locally

Inference · memory estimate

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

Not enough verified architecture information for a reliable VRAM estimate.

Capabilities

Model license
Proprietary