GeekRadar / The comparison desk
COMPARE.
AI models
google

Gemma 4 26B A4B

AI model Released

Context window
262,144 tokens
Open weights
Yes

Capability & preference

General capability · ECI

A cross-benchmark capability estimate. Index points, not a percentage; intervals show uncertainty.

Gemma 4 26B A4B 141.7* Gemma 4 26B A4B · 95% interval 139.2–144.1

Human preference · Arena

Overall text preferences from head-to-head votes. Not factual accuracy or a task-success rate.

Gemma 4 26B A4B 1434.2 Gemma 4 26B A4B · 95% interval 1426.7–1441.6 · 6,090 votes · 2026-10-28

Benchmark results

  • AI2D_TEST · version unreported · reported score88.30*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • AIME26 · version unreported · reported score · Full AIME 2026 I and II88.30*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
    Task set
    Full AIME 2026 I and II*
  • C-Eval · version unreported · reported score82.50*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • CC-OCR · version unreported · reported score74.50*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • CharXiv(RQ) · version unreported · reported score69*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • Claw-Eval Avg · version unreported · reported score58.80*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • Claw-Eval Pass^3 · version unreported · reported score28*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • DeepPlanning · version unreported · reported score16.20*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • GPQA · version unreported · reported score82.30*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • HallusionBench · version unreported · reported score66.10*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • HLE · version unreported · reported score8.70*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • HMMT Feb 25 · version unreported · reported score91.70*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • HMMT Feb 26 · version unreported · reported score79*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • HMMT Nov 25 · version unreported · reported score87.50*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • IMOAnswerBench · version unreported · reported score74.30*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • LiveCodeBench v6 · 6 · reported score77.10*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • Mathvista(mini) · version unreported · reported score79.40*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • MCP-Atlas · version unreported · reported score · Public set50*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
    Judge
    gemini-2.5-pro*
    Task set
    Public set*
  • MCPMark · version unreported · reported score · GitHub MCP v0.30.314.20*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
    Harness
    GitHub MCP v0.30.3*
    Truncation
    Playwright responses at 32K tokens*
  • MMBench EN-DEV-v1.1 · 1.1 · reported score89*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • MMLU-Pro · version unreported · reported score82.60*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • MMLU-Redux · version unreported · reported score92.70*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • MMMU · version unreported · reported score78.40*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • MMMU-Pro · version unreported · reported score73.80*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
    Original footnote
    Asterisk in reported result; its qualification is not specified in the retained table*
  • NL2Repo · version unreported · reported score · Claude Code11.60*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
    Harness
    Claude Code*
    Variant
    Maximum 900 turns*
    Temperature
    1.0*
    Top p
    0.95*
  • OmniDocBench1.5 · 1.5 · reported score74.40*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • QwenClawBench · version unreported · reported score · Internal real-user distribution38.70*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
    Task set
    Internal real-user distribution*
    Temperature
    0.6*
    Context length
    256K tokens*
  • QwenWebBench · version unreported · reported score · Internal1,178* EloPlatform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    BT/Elo rating*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
    Languages
    English and Chinese*
    Categories
    Seven frontend application categories*
    Judge
    Multimodal automatic judge*
    Task set
    Internal*
  • RealWorldQA · version unreported · reported score72.20*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • SimpleVQA · version unreported · reported score52.20*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • SkillsBench Avg5 · version unreported · reported score · OpenCode · Self-contained subset, API-dependent tasks excluded · Mean of five runs12.30*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
    Harness
    OpenCode*
    Tasks
    78*
    Runs
    5*
    Statistic
    Mean of five runs*
    Task set
    Self-contained subset, API-dependent tasks excluded*
  • SuperGPQA · version unreported · reported score61.40*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • SWE-bench Multilingual · version unreported · reported score · Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing · Public benchmark17.30*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
    Harness
    Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing*
    Temperature
    1.0*
    Top p
    0.95*
    Context length
    200K tokens*
    Task set
    Public benchmark*
  • SWE-bench Pro · version unreported · reported score · Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing · Corrected public SWE-bench Pro task set13.80*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
    Harness
    Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing*
    Temperature
    1.0*
    Top p
    0.95*
    Context length
    200K tokens*
    Task set
    Corrected public SWE-bench Pro task set*
  • SWE-bench Verified · version unreported · reported score · Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing · Public benchmark17.40*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
    Harness
    Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing*
    Temperature
    1.0*
    Top p
    0.95*
    Context length
    200K tokens*
    Task set
    Public benchmark*
  • TAU3-Bench · version unreported · reported score59*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
    User model
    gpt-5.2, low reasoning effort*
    Retrieval
    Default BM25*
  • Terminal-Bench 2.0 · 2.0 · reported score · Harbor/Terminus-2 · Mean of five runs34.20*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
    Harness
    Harbor/Terminus-2*
    Timeout
    3 hours*
    Hardware
    32 CPU / 48 GB RAM*
    Runs
    5*
    Statistic
    Mean of five runs*
    Temperature
    1.0*
    Top p
    0.95*
    Top k
    20*
    Maximum output
    80K tokens*
    Context length
    256K tokens*
  • Tool Decathlon · version unreported · reported score12*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • VideoMMMU · version unreported · reported score76*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • VITA-Bench · version unreported · reported score · Average subdomain score36.90*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
    Judge
    claude-4-sonnet*
    Statistic
    Average subdomain score*
  • WideSearch · version unreported · reported score38.30*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*
  • ZEROBench_sub · version unreported · reported score26.30*Platform unreported Compare results
    Test conditions
    Metric
    reported score*
    Checkpoint version
    Not specified*

Recorded results

Only the same benchmark, version, workload, scenario and unit share a row. Missing results are not zero. System results include the full submitted hardware and software configuration.

Arena text preference / chinesehuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,495.50 rating

Confidence interval: 1,470.60 – 1,520.39

523 votes

Category
chinese
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / codinghuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,446.34 rating

Confidence interval: 1,431.67 – 1,461.01

1442 votes

Category
coding
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / creative_writinghuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,401.47 rating

Confidence interval: 1,383.28 – 1,419.66

1000 votes

Category
creative_writing
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / englishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,443.51 rating

Confidence interval: 1,431.59 – 1,455.43

2247 votes

Category
english
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / exclude_tieshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,428.84 rating

Confidence interval: 1,418.07 – 1,439.61

4166 votes

Category
exclude_ties
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / experthuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,447.33 rating

Confidence interval: 1,421.96 – 1,472.70

455 votes

Category
expert
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / frenchhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,461.66 rating

Confidence interval: 1,424.68 – 1,498.63

261 votes

Category
french
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_promptshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,438.51 rating

Confidence interval: 1,428.78 – 1,448.24

3470 votes

Category
hard_prompts
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_prompts_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,447.77 rating

Confidence interval: 1,432.00 – 1,463.53

1276 votes

Category
hard_prompts_english
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,429.10 rating

Confidence interval: 1,412.20 – 1,446.01

1113 votes

Category
industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operations
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_mediahuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,403.54 rating

Confidence interval: 1,386.22 – 1,420.86

1111 votes

Category
industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_media
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_legal_and_governmenthuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,455.94 rating

Confidence interval: 1,428.71 – 1,483.17

415 votes

Category
industry_legal_and_government
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_life_and_physical_and_social_sciencehuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,446.43 rating

Confidence interval: 1,427.94 – 1,464.92

927 votes

Category
industry_life_and_physical_and_social_science
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_mathematicalhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,477.00 rating

Confidence interval: 1,445.74 – 1,508.26

309 votes

Category
industry_mathematical
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_medicine_and_healthcarehuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,427.58 rating

Confidence interval: 1,398.94 – 1,456.23

391 votes

Category
industry_medicine_and_healthcare
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_software_and_it_serviceshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,453.64 rating

Confidence interval: 1,441.72 – 1,465.55

2211 votes

Category
industry_software_and_it_services
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_writing_and_literature_and_languagehuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,405.87 rating

Confidence interval: 1,390.70 – 1,421.03

1395 votes

Category
industry_writing_and_literature_and_language
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / instruction_followinghuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,419.96 rating

Confidence interval: 1,406.51 – 1,433.41

1736 votes

Category
instruction_following
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / longer_queryhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,427.33 rating

Confidence interval: 1,413.62 – 1,441.05

1714 votes

Category
longer_query
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / mathhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,469.71 rating

Confidence interval: 1,442.13 – 1,497.30

389 votes

Category
math
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / multi_turnhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,441.59 rating

Confidence interval: 1,424.65 – 1,458.52

1143 votes

Category
multi_turn
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / non_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,421.72 rating

Confidence interval: 1,412.46 – 1,430.97

3843 votes

Category
non_english
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / overallhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,434.17 rating

Confidence interval: 1,426.75 – 1,441.58

6090 votes

Category
overall
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / russianhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,434.16 rating

Confidence interval: 1,416.14 – 1,452.18

900 votes

Category
russian
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / spanishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,417.11 rating

Confidence interval: 1,375.46 – 1,458.77

202 votes

Category
spanish
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / chinesehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,495.41 rating

Confidence interval: 1,470.56 – 1,520.27

524 votes

Category
chinese
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / codinghuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,446.43 rating

Confidence interval: 1,431.76 – 1,461.09

1445 votes

Category
coding
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / creative_writinghuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,401.45 rating

Confidence interval: 1,383.28 – 1,419.62

1001 votes

Category
creative_writing
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / englishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,443.91 rating

Confidence interval: 1,431.99 – 1,455.83

2249 votes

Category
english
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / exclude_tieshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,428.76 rating

Confidence interval: 1,417.99 – 1,439.53

4167 votes

Category
exclude_ties
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / experthuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,447.27 rating

Confidence interval: 1,421.89 – 1,472.65

455 votes

Category
expert
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / frenchhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,459.68 rating

Confidence interval: 1,422.73 – 1,496.64

262 votes

Category
french
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_promptshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,438.48 rating

Confidence interval: 1,428.76 – 1,448.21

3473 votes

Category
hard_prompts
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_prompts_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,448.14 rating

Confidence interval: 1,432.37 – 1,463.91

1277 votes

Category
hard_prompts_english
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,429.22 rating

Confidence interval: 1,412.34 – 1,446.10

1115 votes

Category
industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operations
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_mediahuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,403.60 rating

Confidence interval: 1,386.28 – 1,420.93

1111 votes

Category
industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_media
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_legal_and_governmenthuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,455.95 rating

Confidence interval: 1,428.71 – 1,483.18

415 votes

Category
industry_legal_and_government
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_life_and_physical_and_social_sciencehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,446.46 rating

Confidence interval: 1,427.99 – 1,464.93

928 votes

Category
industry_life_and_physical_and_social_science
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_mathematicalhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,475.38 rating

Confidence interval: 1,444.23 – 1,506.53

311 votes

Category
industry_mathematical
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_medicine_and_healthcarehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,427.64 rating

Confidence interval: 1,398.99 – 1,456.29

391 votes

Category
industry_medicine_and_healthcare
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_software_and_it_serviceshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,453.61 rating

Confidence interval: 1,441.70 – 1,465.52

2214 votes

Category
industry_software_and_it_services
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_writing_and_literature_and_languagehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,405.60 rating

Confidence interval: 1,390.44 – 1,420.77

1395 votes

Category
industry_writing_and_literature_and_language
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / instruction_followinghuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,420.14 rating

Confidence interval: 1,406.70 – 1,433.59

1738 votes

Category
instruction_following
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / longer_queryhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,427.27 rating

Confidence interval: 1,413.57 – 1,440.98

1715 votes

Category
longer_query
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / mathhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,469.69 rating

Confidence interval: 1,442.17 – 1,497.21

390 votes

Category
math
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / multi_turnhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,441.33 rating

Confidence interval: 1,424.40 – 1,458.26

1143 votes

Category
multi_turn
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / non_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,421.43 rating

Confidence interval: 1,412.19 – 1,430.68

3845 votes

Category
non_english
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / overallhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,434.12 rating

Confidence interval: 1,426.70 – 1,441.53

6094 votes

Category
overall
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / russianhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,433.52 rating

Confidence interval: 1,415.49 – 1,451.56

898 votes

Category
russian
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / spanishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

Gemma 4 26B A4B

1,417.07 rating

Confidence interval: 1,375.60 – 1,458.55

203 votes

Category
spanish
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference

Run it locally

Inference · memory estimate

Gemma 4 26B A4B

48.1 GiB checkpoint tensor payload · 25.81 B stored tensor elements · BF16

Stored tensors can include buffers and repeated shared weights. A verified unique parameter count is unavailable. Checkpoint size is not the memory required to run the model.

Capabilities

Context window
262,144 tokens
Open weights
Yes
Checkpoint tensor payload
48.07 GiB

Input modalities

  • text
  • image

Output modalities

  • text

Processing & platform

Architecture
gemma4

System configuration

Detailed specifications

Specifications · 42 fields
NL2Repo
suite
NL2Repo
workload
reported score · Claude Code
score
11.6*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Harness
Claude Code*
Variant
Maximum 900 turns*
Temperature
1.0*
Top p
0.95*
HallusionBench
suite
HallusionBench
workload
reported score
score
66.1*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
QwenWebBench
suite
QwenWebBench
workload
reported score · Internal
score
1,178.0*
unit
Elo
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
BT/Elo rating*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Languages
English and Chinese*
Categories
Seven frontend application categories*
Judge
Multimodal automatic judge*
Task set
Internal*
OmniDocBench1.5
suite
OmniDocBench1.5
version
1.5
workload
reported score
score
74.4*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
TAU3-Bench
suite
TAU3-Bench
workload
reported score
score
59.0*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
User model
gpt-5.2, low reasoning effort*
Retrieval
Default BM25*
CharXiv(RQ)
suite
CharXiv(RQ)
workload
reported score
score
69.0*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
VITA-Bench
suite
VITA-Bench
workload
reported score · Average subdomain score
score
36.9*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Judge
claude-4-sonnet*
Statistic
Average subdomain score*
CC-OCR
suite
CC-OCR
workload
reported score
score
74.5*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
DeepPlanning
suite
DeepPlanning
workload
reported score
score
16.2*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
AI2D TEST
suite
AI2D_TEST
workload
reported score
score
88.3*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Tool Decathlon
suite
Tool Decathlon
workload
reported score
score
12.0*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
MCPMark
suite
MCPMark
workload
reported score · GitHub MCP v0.30.3
score
14.2*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Harness
GitHub MCP v0.30.3*
Truncation
Playwright responses at 32K tokens*
MCP-Atlas
suite
MCP-Atlas
workload
reported score · Public set
score
50.0*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Judge
gemini-2.5-pro*
Task set
Public set*
WideSearch
suite
WideSearch
workload
reported score
score
38.3*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
SWE-bench Verified
suite
SWE-bench Verified
workload
reported score · Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing · Public benchmark
score
17.4*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Harness
Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing*
Temperature
1.0*
Top p
0.95*
Context length
200K tokens*
Task set
Public benchmark*
MMMU
suite
MMMU
workload
reported score
score
78.4*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
MMLU-Pro
suite
MMLU-Pro
workload
reported score
score
82.6*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
MMLU-Redux
suite
MMLU-Redux
workload
reported score
score
92.7*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
SuperGPQA
suite
SuperGPQA
workload
reported score
score
61.4*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
VideoMMMU
suite
VideoMMMU
workload
reported score
score
76.0*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
C-Eval
suite
C-Eval
workload
reported score
score
82.5*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
GPQA
suite
GPQA
workload
reported score
score
82.3*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
HLE
suite
HLE
workload
reported score
score
8.7*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
LiveCodeBench v6
suite
LiveCodeBench v6
version
6
workload
reported score
score
77.1*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
HMMT Feb 25
suite
HMMT Feb 25
workload
reported score
score
91.7*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
SWE-bench Multilingual
suite
SWE-bench Multilingual
workload
reported score · Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing · Public benchmark
score
17.3*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Harness
Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing*
Temperature
1.0*
Top p
0.95*
Context length
200K tokens*
Task set
Public benchmark*
MMMU-Pro
suite
MMMU-Pro
workload
reported score
score
73.8*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Original footnote
Asterisk in reported result; its qualification is not specified in the retained table*
HMMT Nov 25
suite
HMMT Nov 25
workload
reported score
score
87.5*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
HMMT Feb 26
suite
HMMT Feb 26
workload
reported score
score
79.0*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
IMOAnswerBench
suite
IMOAnswerBench
workload
reported score
score
74.3*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
AIME26
suite
AIME26
workload
reported score · Full AIME 2026 I and II
score
88.3*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Task set
Full AIME 2026 I and II*
Mathvista(mini)
suite
Mathvista(mini)
workload
reported score
score
79.4*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
SWE-bench Pro
suite
SWE-bench Pro
workload
reported score · Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing · Corrected public SWE-bench Pro task set
score
13.8*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Harness
Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing*
Temperature
1.0*
Top p
0.95*
Context length
200K tokens*
Task set
Corrected public SWE-bench Pro task set*
Terminal-Bench 2.0
suite
Terminal-Bench 2.0
version
2.0
workload
reported score · Harbor/Terminus-2 · Mean of five runs
score
34.2*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Harness
Harbor/Terminus-2*
Timeout
3 hours*
Hardware
32 CPU / 48 GB RAM*
Runs
5*
Statistic
Mean of five runs*
Temperature
1.0*
Top p
0.95*
Top k
20*
Maximum output
80K tokens*
Context length
256K tokens*
ZEROBench sub
suite
ZEROBench_sub
workload
reported score
score
26.3*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Claw-Eval Avg
suite
Claw-Eval Avg
workload
reported score
score
58.8*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
RealWorldQA
suite
RealWorldQA
workload
reported score
score
72.2*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Claw-Eval Pass^3
suite
Claw-Eval Pass^3
workload
reported score
score
28.0*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
SkillsBench Avg5
suite
SkillsBench Avg5
workload
reported score · OpenCode · Self-contained subset, API-dependent tasks excluded · Mean of five runs
score
12.3*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Harness
OpenCode*
Tasks
78*
Runs
5*
Statistic
Mean of five runs*
Task set
Self-contained subset, API-dependent tasks excluded*
MMBench EN-DEV-v1.1
suite
MMBench EN-DEV-v1.1
version
1.1
workload
reported score
score
89.0*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
SimpleVQA
suite
SimpleVQA
workload
reported score
score
52.2*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
QwenClawBench
suite
QwenClawBench
workload
reported score · Internal real-user distribution
score
38.7*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Task set
Internal real-user distribution*
Temperature
0.6*
Context length
256K tokens*

* Provisional data