Only the same benchmark, version, workload, scenario and unit share a row. Missing results are not zero. System results include the full submitted hardware and software configuration.
Arena text preference / chinesehuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,495.50 rating
Confidence interval: 1,470.60 – 1,520.39
523 votes
Category
chinese
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / codinghuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,446.34 rating
Confidence interval: 1,431.67 – 1,461.01
1442 votes
Category
coding
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / creative_writinghuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,401.47 rating
Confidence interval: 1,383.28 – 1,419.66
1000 votes
Category
creative_writing
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / englishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,443.51 rating
Confidence interval: 1,431.59 – 1,455.43
2247 votes
Category
english
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / exclude_tieshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,428.84 rating
Confidence interval: 1,418.07 – 1,439.61
4166 votes
Category
exclude_ties
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / experthuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,447.33 rating
Confidence interval: 1,421.96 – 1,472.70
455 votes
Category
expert
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / frenchhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,461.66 rating
Confidence interval: 1,424.68 – 1,498.63
261 votes
Category
french
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_promptshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,438.51 rating
Confidence interval: 1,428.78 – 1,448.24
3470 votes
Category
hard_prompts
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_prompts_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,447.77 rating
Confidence interval: 1,432.00 – 1,463.53
1276 votes
Category
hard_prompts_english
Evaluated configuration
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating
Arena text preference / industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_mediahuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,403.60 rating
Confidence interval: 1,386.28 – 1,420.93
1111 votes
Category
industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_media
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_legal_and_governmenthuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,455.95 rating
Confidence interval: 1,428.71 – 1,483.18
415 votes
Category
industry_legal_and_government
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_life_and_physical_and_social_sciencehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,446.46 rating
Confidence interval: 1,427.99 – 1,464.93
928 votes
Category
industry_life_and_physical_and_social_science
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_mathematicalhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,475.38 rating
Confidence interval: 1,444.23 – 1,506.53
311 votes
Category
industry_mathematical
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_medicine_and_healthcarehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,427.64 rating
Confidence interval: 1,398.99 – 1,456.29
391 votes
Category
industry_medicine_and_healthcare
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_software_and_it_serviceshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,453.61 rating
Confidence interval: 1,441.70 – 1,465.52
2214 votes
Category
industry_software_and_it_services
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_writing_and_literature_and_languagehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,405.60 rating
Confidence interval: 1,390.44 – 1,420.77
1395 votes
Category
industry_writing_and_literature_and_language
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / instruction_followinghuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,420.14 rating
Confidence interval: 1,406.70 – 1,433.59
1738 votes
Category
instruction_following
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / longer_queryhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,427.27 rating
Confidence interval: 1,413.57 – 1,440.98
1715 votes
Category
longer_query
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / mathhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,469.69 rating
Confidence interval: 1,442.17 – 1,497.21
390 votes
Category
math
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / multi_turnhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,441.33 rating
Confidence interval: 1,424.40 – 1,458.26
1143 votes
Category
multi_turn
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / non_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,421.43 rating
Confidence interval: 1,412.19 – 1,430.68
3845 votes
Category
non_english
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / overallhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,434.12 rating
Confidence interval: 1,426.70 – 1,441.53
6094 votes
Category
overall
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / russianhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,433.52 rating
Confidence interval: 1,415.49 – 1,451.56
898 votes
Category
russian
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / spanishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1,417.07 rating
Confidence interval: 1,375.60 – 1,458.55
203 votes
Category
spanish
Evaluated configuration
gemma-4-26b-a4b
Evaluation type
human preference
Run it locally
Inference · memory estimate
Gemma 4 26B A4B
48.1 GiB checkpoint tensor payload · 25.81 B stored tensor elements · BF16
Stored tensors can include buffers and repeated shared weights. A verified unique parameter count is unavailable. Checkpoint size is not the memory required to run the model.
Capabilities
Context window
262,144 tokens
Open weights
Yes
Checkpoint tensor payload
48.07 GiB
Input modalities
text
image
Output modalities
text
Processing & platform
Architecture
gemma4
System configuration
Detailed specifications
Specifications · 42 fields
NL2Repo
suite
NL2Repo
workload
reported score · Claude Code
score
11.6*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Harness
Claude Code*
Variant
Maximum 900 turns*
Temperature
1.0*
Top p
0.95*
HallusionBench
suite
HallusionBench
workload
reported score
score
66.1*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
QwenWebBench
suite
QwenWebBench
workload
reported score · Internal
score
1,178.0*
unit
Elo
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
BT/Elo rating*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Languages
English and Chinese*
Categories
Seven frontend application categories*
Judge
Multimodal automatic judge*
Task set
Internal*
OmniDocBench1.5
suite
OmniDocBench1.5
version
1.5
workload
reported score
score
74.4*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
TAU3-Bench
suite
TAU3-Bench
workload
reported score
score
59.0*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
User model
gpt-5.2, low reasoning effort*
Retrieval
Default BM25*
CharXiv(RQ)
suite
CharXiv(RQ)
workload
reported score
score
69.0*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
VITA-Bench
suite
VITA-Bench
workload
reported score · Average subdomain score
score
36.9*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Judge
claude-4-sonnet*
Statistic
Average subdomain score*
CC-OCR
suite
CC-OCR
workload
reported score
score
74.5*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
DeepPlanning
suite
DeepPlanning
workload
reported score
score
16.2*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
AI2D TEST
suite
AI2D_TEST
workload
reported score
score
88.3*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Tool Decathlon
suite
Tool Decathlon
workload
reported score
score
12.0*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
MCPMark
suite
MCPMark
workload
reported score · GitHub MCP v0.30.3
score
14.2*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Harness
GitHub MCP v0.30.3*
Truncation
Playwright responses at 32K tokens*
MCP-Atlas
suite
MCP-Atlas
workload
reported score · Public set
score
50.0*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Judge
gemini-2.5-pro*
Task set
Public set*
WideSearch
suite
WideSearch
workload
reported score
score
38.3*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
SWE-bench Verified
suite
SWE-bench Verified
workload
reported score · Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing · Public benchmark
score
17.4*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Harness
Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing*
Temperature
1.0*
Top p
0.95*
Context length
200K tokens*
Task set
Public benchmark*
MMMU
suite
MMMU
workload
reported score
score
78.4*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
MMLU-Pro
suite
MMLU-Pro
workload
reported score
score
82.6*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
MMLU-Redux
suite
MMLU-Redux
workload
reported score
score
92.7*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
SuperGPQA
suite
SuperGPQA
workload
reported score
score
61.4*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
VideoMMMU
suite
VideoMMMU
workload
reported score
score
76.0*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
C-Eval
suite
C-Eval
workload
reported score
score
82.5*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
GPQA
suite
GPQA
workload
reported score
score
82.3*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
HLE
suite
HLE
workload
reported score
score
8.7*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
LiveCodeBench v6
suite
LiveCodeBench v6
version
6
workload
reported score
score
77.1*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
HMMT Feb 25
suite
HMMT Feb 25
workload
reported score
score
91.7*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
SWE-bench Multilingual
suite
SWE-bench Multilingual
workload
reported score · Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing · Public benchmark
score
17.3*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Harness
Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing*
Temperature
1.0*
Top p
0.95*
Context length
200K tokens*
Task set
Public benchmark*
MMMU-Pro
suite
MMMU-Pro
workload
reported score
score
73.8*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Original footnote
Asterisk in reported result; its qualification is not specified in the retained table*
HMMT Nov 25
suite
HMMT Nov 25
workload
reported score
score
87.5*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
HMMT Feb 26
suite
HMMT Feb 26
workload
reported score
score
79.0*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
IMOAnswerBench
suite
IMOAnswerBench
workload
reported score
score
74.3*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
AIME26
suite
AIME26
workload
reported score · Full AIME 2026 I and II
score
88.3*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Task set
Full AIME 2026 I and II*
Mathvista(mini)
suite
Mathvista(mini)
workload
reported score
score
79.4*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
SWE-bench Pro
suite
SWE-bench Pro
workload
reported score · Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing · Corrected public SWE-bench Pro task set
score
13.8*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Harness
Internal agent scaffold: bash and file editing*
Temperature
1.0*
Top p
0.95*
Context length
200K tokens*
Task set
Corrected public SWE-bench Pro task set*
Terminal-Bench 2.0
suite
Terminal-Bench 2.0
version
2.0
workload
reported score · Harbor/Terminus-2 · Mean of five runs
score
34.2*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Harness
Harbor/Terminus-2*
Timeout
3 hours*
Hardware
32 CPU / 48 GB RAM*
Runs
5*
Statistic
Mean of five runs*
Temperature
1.0*
Top p
0.95*
Top k
20*
Maximum output
80K tokens*
Context length
256K tokens*
ZEROBench sub
suite
ZEROBench_sub
workload
reported score
score
26.3*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Claw-Eval Avg
suite
Claw-Eval Avg
workload
reported score
score
58.8*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
RealWorldQA
suite
RealWorldQA
workload
reported score
score
72.2*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
Claw-Eval Pass^3
suite
Claw-Eval Pass^3
workload
reported score
score
28.0*
Scope and conditions
Test conditions
Metric
reported score*
Checkpoint version
Not specified*
SkillsBench Avg5
suite
SkillsBench Avg5
workload
reported score · OpenCode · Self-contained subset, API-dependent tasks excluded · Mean of five runs