GeekRadar / The comparison desk
COMPARE.
AI models
Not reported

chatglm-6b

Model evaluation

Capability & preference

Human preference · Arena

Overall text preferences from head-to-head votes. Not factual accuracy or a task-success rate.

chatglm-6b 918.4 chatglm-6b · 95% interval 906.2–930.6 · 4,914 votes · 2026-10-15

Recorded results

Only the same benchmark, version, workload, scenario and unit share a row. Missing results are not zero. System results include the full submitted hardware and software configuration.

Arena text preference / chinesehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

1,077.31 rating

Confidence interval: 1,038.90 – 1,115.72

267 votes

Category
chinese
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / codinghuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

919.19 rating

Confidence interval: 893.07 – 945.30

551 votes

Category
coding
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / creative_writinghuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

899.91 rating

Confidence interval: 876.05 – 923.77

771 votes

Category
creative_writing
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / englishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

938.14 rating

Confidence interval: 924.73 – 951.55

4055 votes

Category
english
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / exclude_tieshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

661.58 rating

Confidence interval: 642.84 – 680.32

3347 votes

Category
exclude_ties
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_promptshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

900.93 rating

Confidence interval: 880.06 – 921.81

848 votes

Category
hard_prompts
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_prompts_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

896.13 rating

Confidence interval: 873.23 – 919.03

732 votes

Category
hard_prompts_english
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

845.54 rating

Confidence interval: 808.26 – 882.82

300 votes

Category
industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operations
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_mediahuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

840.92 rating

Confidence interval: 816.90 – 864.94

774 votes

Category
industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_media
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_legal_and_governmenthuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

895.29 rating

Confidence interval: 848.77 – 941.81

195 votes

Category
industry_legal_and_government
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_life_and_physical_and_social_sciencehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

849.37 rating

Confidence interval: 824.60 – 874.15

819 votes

Category
industry_life_and_physical_and_social_science
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_mathematicalhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

911.96 rating

Confidence interval: 884.51 – 939.40

466 votes

Category
industry_mathematical
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_medicine_and_healthcarehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

823.99 rating

Confidence interval: 771.81 – 876.16

193 votes

Category
industry_medicine_and_healthcare
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_software_and_it_serviceshuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

888.39 rating

Confidence interval: 868.77 – 908.01

1162 votes

Category
industry_software_and_it_services
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_writing_and_literature_and_languagehuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

925.37 rating

Confidence interval: 905.44 – 945.29

1056 votes

Category
industry_writing_and_literature_and_language
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / instruction_followinghuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

901.72 rating

Confidence interval: 884.28 – 919.15

1277 votes

Category
instruction_following
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / mathhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

925.66 rating

Confidence interval: 900.49 – 950.84

525 votes

Category
math
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / multi_turnhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

856.42 rating

Confidence interval: 827.26 – 885.57

492 votes

Category
multi_turn
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / non_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

904.83 rating

Confidence interval: 883.45 – 926.21

859 votes

Category
non_english
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / overallhuman preference · 2026-10-15 · rating

chatglm-6b

918.42 rating

Confidence interval: 906.20 – 930.64

4914 votes

Category
overall
Evaluated configuration
chatglm-6b
Evaluation type
human preference

Run it locally

Inference · memory estimate

chatglm-6b

Not enough verified architecture information for a reliable VRAM estimate.

Capabilities

Model license
Non-commercial