GeekRadar / The comparison desk
COMPARE.
AI models
Not reported

ChatGLM 6B

Model evaluation

Capability & preference

Human preference · Arena

Overall text preferences from head-to-head votes. Not factual accuracy or a task-success rate.

ChatGLM 6B 918.4 ChatGLM 6B · 95% interval 906.2–930.7 · 4,914 votes · 2026-10-28

Recorded results

Only the same benchmark, version, workload, scenario and unit share a row. Missing results are not zero. System results include the full submitted hardware and software configuration.

Arena text preference / chinesehuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

1,077.26 rating

Confidence interval: 1,038.88 – 1,115.65

267 votes

Category
chinese
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / codinghuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

919.09 rating

Confidence interval: 892.99 – 945.19

551 votes

Category
coding
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / creative_writinghuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

899.75 rating

Confidence interval: 875.91 – 923.60

771 votes

Category
creative_writing
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / englishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

938.19 rating

Confidence interval: 924.79 – 951.59

4055 votes

Category
english
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / exclude_tieshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

661.57 rating

Confidence interval: 642.84 – 680.31

3347 votes

Category
exclude_ties
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_promptshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

900.94 rating

Confidence interval: 880.08 – 921.81

848 votes

Category
hard_prompts
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / hard_prompts_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

896.24 rating

Confidence interval: 873.36 – 919.13

732 votes

Category
hard_prompts_english
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

845.50 rating

Confidence interval: 808.25 – 882.76

300 votes

Category
industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operations
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_mediahuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

840.86 rating

Confidence interval: 816.85 – 864.86

774 votes

Category
industry_entertainment_and_sports_and_media
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_legal_and_governmenthuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

895.55 rating

Confidence interval: 849.05 – 942.04

195 votes

Category
industry_legal_and_government
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_life_and_physical_and_social_sciencehuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

849.39 rating

Confidence interval: 824.63 – 874.16

819 votes

Category
industry_life_and_physical_and_social_science
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_mathematicalhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

911.96 rating

Confidence interval: 884.53 – 939.40

466 votes

Category
industry_mathematical
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_medicine_and_healthcarehuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

823.93 rating

Confidence interval: 771.79 – 876.07

193 votes

Category
industry_medicine_and_healthcare
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_software_and_it_serviceshuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

888.30 rating

Confidence interval: 868.69 – 907.92

1162 votes

Category
industry_software_and_it_services
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / industry_writing_and_literature_and_languagehuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

925.30 rating

Confidence interval: 905.39 – 945.22

1056 votes

Category
industry_writing_and_literature_and_language
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / instruction_followinghuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

901.71 rating

Confidence interval: 884.28 – 919.14

1277 votes

Category
instruction_following
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / mathhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

925.70 rating

Confidence interval: 900.53 – 950.87

525 votes

Category
math
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / multi_turnhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

856.42 rating

Confidence interval: 827.28 – 885.56

492 votes

Category
multi_turn
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / non_englishhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

904.73 rating

Confidence interval: 883.36 – 926.11

859 votes

Category
non_english
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference
Arena text preference / overallhuman preference · 2026-10-28 · rating

ChatGLM 6B

918.44 rating

Confidence interval: 906.22 – 930.65

4914 votes

Category
overall
Evaluated configuration
ChatGLM 6B
Evaluation type
human preference

Run it locally

Inference · memory estimate

ChatGLM 6B

Not enough verified architecture information for a reliable VRAM estimate.

Capabilities

Model license
Non-commercial